ASMOX vs. VRTGX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

ASMOX (AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund) and VRTGX (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ASMOX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTGX.

Performance

ASMOX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMOX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTGX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: 13.81%
• YTD: 20.68%
• 1Y: 35.67%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 11.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMOX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASMOX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund	17.33%	16.87%	16.54%	18.37%	-19.56%	15.37%	25.76%	26.47%	-12.14%	17.43%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	20.68%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-26.30%	2.82%	34.81%	28.84%	-9.21%	22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMOX and VRTGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.97

The correlation between ASMOX and VRTGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.97 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ASMOX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 48
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMOX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund (ASMOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMOX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.29	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.19	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMOX	VRTGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.97%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.80%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.28%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.38%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMOX	VRTGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.21%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.71%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.51%	—

ASMOX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMOX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMOX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

ASMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than VRTGX's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASMOX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund	7.88%	8.12%	18.80%	3.92%	0.57%	24.81%	5.46%	4.38%	29.63%	9.90%	0.79%	1.23%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.61%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMOX and VRTGX in my portfolio?

ASMOX and VRTGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.