PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMNX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASMNX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VRTGX

1D
0.86%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.83%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASMNX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N
17.21%16.62%16.62%18.09%-19.78%15.05%25.80%25.69%-12.36%17.21%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.46%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMNX and VRTGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.97

The correlation between ASMNX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMNX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMNX

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMNXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMNXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

Volatility

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMNXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMNX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

ASMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMNX
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N
7.75%8.05%19.09%3.54%0.27%24.51%5.45%3.83%29.34%9.61%0.00%0.97%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ASMNX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMNX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer