ASMNX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASMNX (AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. ASMNX is actively managed, while FGROX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASMNX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

ASMNX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASMNX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGROX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 68.45%
• 3Y*: 29.82%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMNX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASMNX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N	17.21%	16.62%	16.62%	18.09%	-19.78%	15.05%	25.80%	25.69%	-12.36%	17.21%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	26.22%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMNX and FGROX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.93

The correlation between ASMNX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASMNX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMNX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N (ASMNX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMNX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.52	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMNX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.48%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.25%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMNX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	25.34%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	25.58%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.18%	—

ASMNX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMNX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMNX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

ASMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, less than FGROX's 9.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASMNX AQR Small Cap Momentum Style Fund Class N	7.75%	8.05%	19.09%	3.54%	0.27%	24.51%	5.45%	3.83%	29.34%	9.61%	0.00%	0.97%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	9.02%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMNX and FGROX in my portfolio?

ASMNX and FGROX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.