PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMF vs. NFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASMF vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASMF vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
5.61%1.16%-3.56%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
-0.18%8.77%4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMF achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than NFLT's -0.18% return.


ASMF

1D
0.95%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
5.61%
6M
9.20%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLT

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.38%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASMF vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASMF vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMF
ASMF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ASMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLT
NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMF vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMFNFLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

1.36

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.91

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.67

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.75

10.69

-6.94

ASMF vs. NFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the NFLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMF and NFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMFNFLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.36

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.82

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between ASMF and NFLT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASMF vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison

ASMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than NFLT's 5.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
0.20%0.22%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
5.66%5.74%5.76%6.02%4.16%3.41%3.63%4.33%4.81%6.23%5.30%0.67%

Drawdowns

ASMF vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMF drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLT drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMF and NFLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMFNFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-15.17%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-2.52%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.68%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-2.13%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.63%

+1.91%

Volatility

ASMF vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison

Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF (ASMF) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 2.03%. This indicates that ASMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASMFNFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

2.03%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

3.00%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

4.92%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

4.42%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

4.93%

+6.28%