ASIC vs. NVDA
ASIC (Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. ASIC operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, ASIC returned -12.21% vs 44.72% for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ASIC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIC achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return.
ASIC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- -12.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.83%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
ASIC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASIC Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC | -1.14% | -11.16% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 29.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIC and NVDA is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.00 |
Fundamentals
ASIC:
$1.03B
NVDA:
$5.00T
ASIC:
$1.95
NVDA:
$6.53
ASIC:
10.66
NVDA:
31.44
ASIC:
0.05
NVDA:
0.17
ASIC:
2.06
NVDA:
19.80
ASIC:
1.64
NVDA:
25.60
ASIC:
$470.18M
NVDA:
$253.49B
ASIC:
$257.61M
NVDA:
$187.95B
ASIC:
$120.37M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ASIC
NVDA
ASIC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASIC | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.07 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 4.94 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASIC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIC drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIC and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIC | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -89.72% | +56.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.77% | -20.21% | -10.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.84% | -12.86% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -36.18% | +17.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.98% | 8.46% | +9.52% |
Volatility
ASIC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is 9.65%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that ASIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIC | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 13.26% | -3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.68% | 26.67% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.68% | 35.00% | +12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 51.76% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 49.84% | -2.05% |
Dividends
ASIC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ASIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIC Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
ASIC vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASIC vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
ASIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a gross profit of 67.08M and revenue of 128.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
ASIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported an operating income of 34.23M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
ASIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to ASIC (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIC dropped -33.63% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASIC and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer