ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ASIA.AX (BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF) and FUEL.AX (Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASIA.AX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Asia Ex-Japan Technology & Internet Tigers Index, while FUEL.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ASIA.AX returned 13.39%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for FUEL.AX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF (ASIA.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA.AX achieves a 41.66% return, which is significantly higher than FUEL.AX's 24.46% return.

ASIA.AX

• 1D: -4.07%
• 1M: -8.91%
• 6M: 31.84%
• YTD: 41.66%
• 1Y: 73.48%
• 3Y*: 40.14%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: —

FUEL.AX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 17.84%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 30.85%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: 5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ASIA.AX BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF	41.66%	43.48%	34.52%	10.84%	-26.08%	-15.49%	62.13%	36.05%	-14.17%
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	24.46%	10.28%	-1.04%	-2.17%	37.74%	29.02%	-32.28%	10.04%	-17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018	0.18

The correlation between ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA.AX

ASIA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 78
ASIA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ASIA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ASIA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ASIA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASIA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FUEL.AX

FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF (ASIA.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASIA.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.39	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.03	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	2.42	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	7.20	+5.76

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA.AX drawdown since its inception was -59.62%, smaller than the maximum FUEL.AX drawdown of -65.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIA.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.62%	-65.66%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.12%	-12.87%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.53%	-22.90%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.50%	-23.54%	-26.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.73%	-7.65%	-6.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-13.62%	-8.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	4.37%	+0.91%

Volatility

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF (ASIA.AX) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) at 5.70%. This indicates that ASIA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUEL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIA.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.77%	5.70%	+10.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.08%	19.38%	+10.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.13%	22.36%	+10.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.70%	24.26%	+3.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.20%	26.38%	-0.18%

Dividends

ASIA.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Dividend Comparison

ASIA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FUEL.AX's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASIA.AX BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF	1.55%	0.61%	0.29%	0.05%	1.16%	4.15%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	3.37%	0.00%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.64%	1.25%	1.92%	3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX in my portfolio?

ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between ASIA.AX and FUEL.AX?

ASIA.AX is categorized as Technology Equities, while FUEL.AX is Global Equities. ASIA.AX tracks Solactive Asia Ex-Japan Technology & Internet Tigers Index, while FUEL.AX tracks Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index.