ASGI vs. PEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO).
ASGI is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jul 29, 2020. PEO is an actively managed fund by Adams Funds. It was launched on Jan 30, 1929.
Performance
ASGI vs. PEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASGI vs. PEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 2.90% | 44.20% | 10.26% | 14.48% | -10.50% | 18.17% | -0.47% |
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund | 30.48% | 9.98% | 13.58% | 0.91% | 41.77% | 53.75% | -1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than PEO's 30.48% return.
ASGI
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- —
PEO
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- 30.48%
- 6M
- 34.88%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 22.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASGI vs. PEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASGI has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PEO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASGI vs. PEO — Risk / Return Rank
ASGI
PEO
ASGI vs. PEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASGI | PEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.49 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.96 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.98 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 6.73 | +2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASGI | PEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.49 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.95 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.33 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASGI and PEO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ASGI vs. PEO - Dividend Comparison
ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.31%, more than PEO's 7.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.31% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund | 7.23% | 9.43% | 8.14% | 6.54% | 7.48% | 5.51% | 6.42% | 6.68% | 5.63% | 5.95% | 5.65% | 7.78% |
Drawdowns
ASGI vs. PEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum PEO drawdown of -71.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and PEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASGI | PEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -71.88% | +48.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -17.54% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -24.30% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -1.97% | -9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -15.36% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 5.15% | -1.33% |
Volatility
ASGI vs. PEO - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) at 5.35%. This indicates that ASGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASGI | PEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 5.35% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.50% | 12.23% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.10% | 22.74% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 23.41% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 27.28% | -9.93% |