ASGI vs. PEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and PEO (Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - ASGI is a Industrials Equities fund managed by Aberdeen, while PEO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Adams Funds. Over the past 5 years, ASGI returned 10.77%/yr vs 18.76%/yr for PEO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASGI charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PEO.

Performance

ASGI vs. PEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly lower than PEO's 26.23% return.

ASGI

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 28.21%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

PEO

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: 26.23%
• 6M: 25.94%
• 1Y: 40.21%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASGI vs. PEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	5.26%	44.20%	10.26%	14.48%	-10.50%	18.17%	-0.47%
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	26.23%	9.98%	13.58%	0.91%	41.77%	53.75%	-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ASGI and PEO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between ASGI and PEO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ASGI vs. PEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASGI

ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 27
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 28

PEO

PEO Risk / Return Rank: 63
PEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PEO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PEO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASGI vs. PEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASGI	PEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.33	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.01	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	4.17	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	12.08	-5.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASGI vs. PEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the PEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASGI and PEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASGI	PEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	2.33	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.80	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.33	+0.41

Drawdowns

ASGI vs. PEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum PEO drawdown of -71.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and PEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASGI	PEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-71.88%	+48.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.15%	-9.70%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.24%	-18.86%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.71%	-24.30%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.05%	-5.17%	-3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-15.32%	+9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	3.34%	+0.85%

Volatility

ASGI vs. PEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is 5.15%, while Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that ASGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASGI	PEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	6.69%	-1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	14.33%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	17.36%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	23.44%	-6.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	27.32%	-9.95%

ASGI vs. PEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASGI has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PEO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASGI vs. PEO - Dividend Comparison

ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than PEO's 7.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund	11.54%	10.96%	12.84%	8.03%	8.25%	6.33%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	7.62%	9.43%	8.14%	6.54%	7.48%	5.51%	6.42%	6.68%	5.63%	5.95%	5.65%	7.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASGI and PEO in my portfolio?

ASGI and PEO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASGI or PEO?

PEO has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to ASGI (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASGI dropped -23.71% vs PEO's -71.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.