PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASFYX vs. UGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASFYX vs. UGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASFYX achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than UGL's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ASFYX has underperformed UGL with an annualized return of 2.90%, while UGL has yielded a comparatively higher 17.75% annualized return.


ASFYX

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.91%
YTD
14.34%
6M
16.70%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
2.90%

UGL

1D
-7.30%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-7.82%
6M
-3.83%
1Y
46.42%
3Y*
49.47%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
17.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASFYX vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
14.34%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-7.82%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ASFYX and UGL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.09

Over the past year, ASFYX and UGL have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASFYX vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASFYX vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASFYXUGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

1.06

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.23

2.56

+14.67

ASFYX vs. UGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASFYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the UGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASFYX and UGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASFYXUGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.80

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.70

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.55

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.38

-0.03

Drawdowns

ASFYX vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASFYX drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum UGL drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASFYX and UGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASFYXUGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-75.93%

+39.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-40.22%

+34.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.32%

-40.22%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.43%

-40.23%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-46.23%

+9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.87%

-40.22%

+21.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-43.63%

+30.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

16.70%

-15.25%

Volatility

ASFYX vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) is 3.75%, while ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that ASFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASFYXUGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

11.42%

-7.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

47.43%

-37.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

53.42%

-41.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

36.32%

-22.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.71%

32.42%

-19.71%

ASFYX vs. UGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASFYX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than UGL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASFYX vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison

ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.33%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASFYX and UGL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGL has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to ASFYX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASFYX dropped -36.43% vs UGL's -75.93%.

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASFYX and UGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer