ASEC vs. MID
ASEC (American Century Securitized Credit ETF) and MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASEC is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by American Century, while MID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ASEC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MID.
Performance
ASEC vs. MID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASEC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MID
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $734.43 | $3.06K | $464.20K | |
| $208.29K | $284.96K | $257.80K |
ASEC vs. MID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | -0.09% |
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASEC and MID is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASEC vs. MID — Risk / Return Rank
ASEC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MID
ASEC vs. MID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASEC | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASEC vs. MID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASEC drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum MID drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEC and MID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASEC | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -40.15% | +39.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -4.16% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -13.17% | +12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
ASEC vs. MID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASEC | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 17.59% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.39% | 23.71% | -22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.39% | 23.81% | -22.42% |
ASEC vs. MID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASEC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MID's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASEC vs. MID - Dividend Comparison
ASEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than MID's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASEC and MID have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASEC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASEC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.
ASEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.15% for MID.
ASEC is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while MID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ASEC and 0.45% for MID.
Find the right allocation for ASEC and MID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer