PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASDV.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.L's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ASDV.L has underperformed XCHA.L with an annualized return of 6.48%, while XCHA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.


ASDV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.59%
6M
2.69%
YTD
5.63%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
6.48%

XCHA.L

1D
-2.09%
1M
-3.30%
6M
3.79%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASDV.L
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
5.63%23.26%4.85%15.47%-15.61%2.53%0.15%20.64%-9.02%29.84%
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
7.49%30.11%16.00%-11.00%-24.25%3.24%45.85%40.57%-24.26%35.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ASDV.L and XCHA.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.54

The correlation between ASDV.L and XCHA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASDV.L
XCHA.L

Financial Services

32.1%
18.8%

Utilities

12.7%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
6.6%

Technology

8.4%
31.6%

Industrials

8.1%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
6.2%

Healthcare

7.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

6.7%
1.5%

Real Estate

4.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
9.1%

Energy

-

2.7%

Financial Services

ASDV.L
32.1%
XCHA.L
18.8%

Utilities

ASDV.L
12.7%
XCHA.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

ASDV.L
9.7%
XCHA.L
6.6%

Technology

ASDV.L
8.4%
XCHA.L
31.6%

Industrials

ASDV.L
8.1%
XCHA.L
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ASDV.L
7.4%
XCHA.L
6.2%

Healthcare

ASDV.L
7.1%
XCHA.L
4.3%

Communication Services

ASDV.L
6.7%
XCHA.L
1.5%

Real Estate

ASDV.L
4.7%
XCHA.L
0.4%

Basic Materials

ASDV.L
3.1%
XCHA.L
9.1%

Energy

ASDV.L

-

XCHA.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASDV.L
ASDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHA.L
XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASDV.LXCHA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

4.41

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

11.99

-7.99

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASDV.L and XCHA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASDV.L drawdown since its inception was -35.08%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.L drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASDV.L and XCHA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASDV.LXCHA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.08%

-50.90%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-7.02%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-26.85%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.29%

-39.75%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-44.89%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-6.93%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-23.99%

+15.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.59%

+0.59%

Volatility

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ASDV.L) is 2.78%, while Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that ASDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASDV.LXCHA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

8.81%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

14.54%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

18.95%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

22.63%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

22.78%

-7.64%

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASDV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASDV.L vs. XCHA.L - Dividend Comparison

ASDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while XCHA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASDV.L
SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
2.82%2.85%3.11%2.89%3.63%2.98%2.82%2.65%2.52%1.70%2.37%3.24%
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASDV.L and XCHA.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCHA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCHA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ASDV.L.

ASDV.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XCHA.L is China Equities. ASDV.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD, while XCHA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ASDV.L and 0.50% for XCHA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASDV.L and XCHA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer