ASCI vs. IBIF
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. ASCI is actively managed, while IBIF is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIF.
Performance
ASCI vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than IBIF's 1.08% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASCI vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 4.49% | 1.37% |
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.08% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and IBIF is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIF
ASCI vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCI | IBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, which is greater than IBIF's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and IBIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | IBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -2.50% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -0.93% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -0.55% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. IBIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | IBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 2.07% | +17.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 3.54% | +15.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 3.54% | +15.84% |
ASCI vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IBIF's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 3.77% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and IBIF have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.77% for ASCI.
ASCI is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IBIF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.10% for IBIF.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and IBIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer