PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7J.DE vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2B7J.DE is traded in EUR, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7J.DE achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 9.11% return.


2B7J.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
5.72%
YTD
10.88%
6M
11.67%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.08%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2B7J.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.88%2.89%17.47%20.94%-16.87%36.52%9.59%19.82%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
9.11%-3.68%27.23%19.09%-14.06%18.67%-0.24%16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7J.DE and QYLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.44

The correlation between 2B7J.DE and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7J.DE
2B7J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
2B7J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7J.DEQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.99

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

16.86

-8.15

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7J.DE and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7J.DEQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.19

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.62

+0.17

Drawdowns

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7J.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.11%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7J.DE and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7J.DEQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.11%

-27.40%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-4.35%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.26%

-23.12%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.26%

-23.12%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.79%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.29%

+0.84%

Volatility

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (2B7J.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.61%. This indicates that 2B7J.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7J.DEQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

1.61%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

7.28%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

9.91%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

15.38%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

16.63%

-0.34%

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7J.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B7J.DE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

2B7J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7J.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.13%1.23%1.37%1.55%1.74%1.15%1.28%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7J.DE and QYLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7J.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7J.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

2B7J.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. 2B7J.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 2B7J.DE and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7J.DE and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer