ASCGX vs. ETEGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ASCGX (Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ASCGX returned 13.38%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASCGX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.

Performance

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund (ASCGX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCGX achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than ETEGX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ASCGX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 13.38%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.

ASCGX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 24.27%
• 6M: 20.16%
• 1Y: 47.84%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

ETEGX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.94%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: -1.01%
• 3Y*: 5.33%
• 5Y*: 1.88%
• 10Y*: 8.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASCGX Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund	24.27%	9.80%	27.71%	4.36%	-37.35%	10.35%	52.78%	25.62%	-1.96%	28.28%
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	2.25%	-6.20%	14.65%	11.28%	-15.52%	21.45%	12.73%	27.57%	-6.00%	14.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCGX and ETEGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2004	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between ASCGX and ETEGX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ASCGX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCGX

ASCGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
ASCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ASCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ASCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ASCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ASCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ETEGX

ETEGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ETEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ETEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ETEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund (ASCGX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASCGX	ETEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	-0.07	+2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	0.02	+2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.00	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	-0.08	+3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	-0.19	+14.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the ETEGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCGX and ETEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASCGX	ETEGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	-0.07	+2.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.10	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.41	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.28	+0.09

Drawdowns

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCGX drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCGX and ETEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASCGX	ETEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.31%	-67.58%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.24%	-13.05%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.25%	-19.98%	-12.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.73%	-24.30%	-26.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.73%	-36.66%	-14.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.72%	+9.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-22.76%	+6.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	5.81%	-2.34%

Volatility

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison

Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund (ASCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.35%. This indicates that ASCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASCGX	ETEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	4.35%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.69%	11.12%	+7.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.21%	15.99%	+9.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.09%	18.77%	+7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	19.84%	+5.78%

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASCGX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison

ASCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCGX Lisanti Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	2.72%	30.62%	7.05%	2.20%	4.36%	26.72%	1.67%	5.31%
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund	8.05%	8.23%	5.13%	0.68%	3.22%	13.87%	1.06%	7.19%	12.29%	11.02%	13.88%	23.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASCGX and ETEGX in my portfolio?

ASCGX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASCGX or ETEGX?

ASCGX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to ETEGX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCGX dropped -59.31% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.