ASC vs. SHV
ASC (Ardmore Shipping Corporation) is a stock, while SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 10 years, ASC returned 11.28%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ASC vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASC achieves a 64.74% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ASC has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 11.28%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.
ASC
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- 64.74%
- 6M
- 62.89%
- 1Y
- 79.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 35.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
ASC vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 64.74% | -10.36% | -8.18% | 5.81% | 326.33% | 3.36% | -63.57% | 93.79% | -41.63% | 8.11% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.61% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASC and SHV is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | -0.06 |
The correlation between ASC and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (5 years) to 0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASC vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
ASC
SHV
ASC vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -95.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 35.59 | -34.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 141.48 | -137.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 1,585.42 | -1,576.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASC vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASC drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASC and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.11% | -0.45% | -79.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -0.03% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.41% | -0.03% | -61.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.41% | -0.38% | -61.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.21% | -0.45% | -70.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.34% | 0.00% | -19.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.90% | -0.03% | -38.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.10% | 0.00% | +9.10% |
Volatility
ASC vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.07%. This indicates that ASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.28% | 0.07% | +12.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 0.13% | +27.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.26% | 0.21% | +36.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.81% | 0.29% | +45.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.28% | 0.28% | +51.00% |
Dividends
ASC vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
ASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, which matches SHV's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASC Ardmore Shipping Corporation | 3.84% | 2.83% | 8.89% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 4.80% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASC and SHV have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASC has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to SHV (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASC dropped -80.11% vs SHV's -0.45%.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.56 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASC and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer