ARVR vs. CHPS
ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARVR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARVR returned 35.02% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
ARVR vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
ARVR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 35.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARVR vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF | 18.88% | 29.07% | 10.11% | 6.20% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARVR and CHPS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ARVR and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARVR vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARVR
CHPS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ARVR
CHPS
Communication Services
ARVR
CHPS
-
Healthcare
ARVR
CHPS
-
Industrials
ARVR
CHPS
Basic Materials
ARVR
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARVR
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
ARVR
-
CHPS
-
Energy
ARVR
-
CHPS
Financial Services
ARVR
-
CHPS
Real Estate
ARVR
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
ARVR
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARVR vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
ARVR
CHPS
ARVR vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARVR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 6.54 | -4.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 6.07 | -3.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.81 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 12.87 | -10.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 49.99 | -43.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARVR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 6.54 | -4.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.81 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
ARVR vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARVR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -39.44% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -17.50% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -9.16% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 4.50% | +1.33% |
Volatility
ARVR vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is 5.84%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that ARVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARVR | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 14.18% | -8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 28.19% | -13.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 34.43% | -15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 33.78% | -10.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 33.78% | -10.34% |
ARVR vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARVR vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 0.11% | 0.27% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARVR and CHPS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to ARVR (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.25% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 35.02% for ARVR. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ARVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 35.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.
ARVR has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.
ARVR is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARVR and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer