ARVR vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARVR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ARVR returned 23.99% vs 199.74% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

ARVR vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.68% return.

ARVR

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 23.99%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -8.79%
• 1M: 14.08%
• YTD: 107.68%
• 6M: 109.36%
• 1Y: 199.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARVR vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	13.47%	29.07%	10.11%	8.32%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.68%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and CHPS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.83

The correlation between ARVR and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARVR vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARVR

ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 31
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARVR vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARVR	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	5.05	-3.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	4.70	-3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.66	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	11.49	-10.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	42.41	-38.36

ARVR vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.40%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARVR	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.40%	-39.44%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.73%	-17.50%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-8.79%	+3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-9.08%	+3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	4.73%	+1.20%

Volatility

ARVR vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) is 10.82%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 22.65%. This indicates that ARVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARVR	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.82%	22.65%	-11.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.60%	34.27%	-16.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.41%	39.81%	-18.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	35.53%	-11.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	35.53%	-11.75%

ARVR vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARVR vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than CHPS's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.81%	0.11%	0.27%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.31%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARVR and CHPS in my portfolio?

ARVR and CHPS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARVR or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.65%) compared to ARVR (10.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.40% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, ARVR or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 199.74% vs 23.99% for ARVR. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ARVR has been the lower-risk option at 10.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARVR or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 199.74% return vs 23.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARVR or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARVR or CHPS?

ARVR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.31% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between ARVR and CHPS?

ARVR is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.