ARP vs. DOGG
ARP (PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARP is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by PMV, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARP returned 13.08%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for DOGG. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARP charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
ARP vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARP achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 11.04% return.
ARP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.87%
DOGG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.46K | $121.20K | $189.42K | |
| $622.61K | $753.69K | $702.49K |
ARP vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 8.24% | 18.33% | 13.79% | 3.60% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 11.04% | 19.43% | -2.58% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARP and DOGG is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARP and DOGG has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARP vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
ARP
DOGG
ARP vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARP | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.74 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 5.80 | +1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARP vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARP drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARP and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARP | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -11.19% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.13% | -8.29% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.13% | -11.19% | +1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -2.39% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -3.27% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.91% | -0.86% |
Volatility
ARP vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) is 3.87%, while FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARP | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 5.00% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 9.40% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 11.50% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 13.07% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 13.07% | -2.56% |
ARP vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARP has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARP vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, less than DOGG's 8.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 6.04% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 2.67% | 0.06% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.63% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARP and DOGG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOGG has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ARP (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARP dropped -10.13% vs DOGG's -11.19%.
On 3-year performance, ARP leads with 13.08% vs 11.93% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARP has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARP has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 6.04% for ARP.
ARP is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: PMV and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for ARP and 0.75% for DOGG.
DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARP and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer