PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMY vs. NATO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ARMY is traded in EUR, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


ARMY

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NATO.L

1D
-1.20%
1M
10.59%
YTD
15.10%
6M
19.51%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMY and NATO.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMY vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMY

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMYNATO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

1.36

-1.34

Drawdowns

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMY drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum NATO.L drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMY and NATO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMYNATO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-21.83%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.33%

-1.20%

-5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-2.58%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMYNATO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.53%

20.44%

+12.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.53%

27.67%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

27.67%

+4.86%

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMY vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARMY nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMY and NATO.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.

ARMY tracks VettaFi European Future of Defence Screened Index, while NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ARMY and 0.49% for NATO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMY and NATO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer