ARMY vs. NATO.L
ARMY (HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF) and NATO.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating) are both Aerospace & Defense funds from HANetf - ARMY tracks the VettaFi European Future of Defence Screened Index while NATO.L tracks the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NATO.L.
Performance
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARMY is traded in EUR, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
ARMY
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NATO.L
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 20.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMY HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF | 0.10% |
NATO.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMY and NATO.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMY vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARMY
NATO.L
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMY | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 1.36 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMY drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum NATO.L drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMY and NATO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMY | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -21.83% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -1.20% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -2.58% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMY | NATO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.53% | 20.44% | +12.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 27.67% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 27.67% | +4.86% |
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMY vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARMY nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMY and NATO.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMY is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.
ARMY tracks VettaFi European Future of Defence Screened Index, while NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ARMY and 0.49% for NATO.L.
Find the right allocation for ARMY and NATO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer