ARMY vs. IDFN.L
ARMY (HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF) and IDFN.L (Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - ARMY tracks the VettaFi European Future of Defence Screened Index while IDFN.L tracks the S&P Kensho Global Future Defense Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IDFN.L.
Performance
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARMY is traded in EUR, while IDFN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDFN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
ARMY
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDFN.L
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 15.45%
- YTD
- 38.48%
- 6M
- 47.14%
- 1Y
- 79.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMY HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF | 0.10% |
IDFN.L Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc | 26.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMY and IDFN.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMY vs. IDFN.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARMY
IDFN.L
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of European Defence Screened UCITS ETF (ARMY) and Invesco Defence Innovation UCITS ETF Acc (IDFN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMY | IDFN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 2.20 | -2.18 |
Drawdowns
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMY drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum IDFN.L drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMY and IDFN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMY | IDFN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -16.28% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -3.02% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -3.59% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.91% | — |
Volatility
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMY | IDFN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.53% | 25.81% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 27.30% | +5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 27.30% | +5.23% |
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDFN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMY vs. IDFN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARMY nor IDFN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMY and IDFN.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDFN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDFN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ARMY.
ARMY tracks VettaFi European Future of Defence Screened Index, while IDFN.L tracks S&P Kensho Global Future Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ARMY and 0.35% for IDFN.L.
Find the right allocation for ARMY and IDFN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer