PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMW vs. TOPW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMW vs. TOPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 297.09% return, which is significantly higher than TOPW's -4.42% return.


ARMW

1D
-13.02%
1M
22.00%
YTD
297.09%
6M
286.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOPW

1D
-2.57%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMW vs. TOPW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
297.09%-41.28%
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
-4.42%-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMW and TOPW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMW vs. TOPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMW vs. TOPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARMW vs. TOPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than TOPW's maximum drawdown of -29.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and TOPW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMWTOPWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-29.87%

-18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.08%

-20.15%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.29%

-13.01%

-12.28%

Volatility

ARMW vs. TOPW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMWTOPWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.74%

27.87%

+66.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.74%

27.87%

+66.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.74%

27.87%

+66.87%

ARMW vs. TOPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMW and TOPW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

ARMW vs. TOPW - Dividend Comparison

ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.98%, less than TOPW's 47.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
25.98%16.38%
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
47.37%21.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMW and TOPW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMW and TOPW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 47.37%, compared with 25.98% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMW and TOPW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer