ARMW vs. RDTY
ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for RDTY.
Performance
ARMW vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 297.09% return, which is significantly higher than RDTY's 17.09% return.
ARMW
- 1D
- -13.02%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 297.09%
- 6M
- 286.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTY
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 297.09% | -41.28% |
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 17.09% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMW and RDTY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMW vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDTY
ARMW vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMW | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMW vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and RDTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMW | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -17.31% | -31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.08% | -0.85% | -19.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.29% | -2.68% | -22.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility
ARMW vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMW | RDTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.74% | 17.51% | +77.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.74% | 22.06% | +72.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.74% | 22.06% | +72.68% |
ARMW vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMW vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison
ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.98%, less than RDTY's 42.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 25.98% | 16.38% |
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 42.29% | 36.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMW and RDTY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.
RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 42.29%, compared with 25.98% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 1.01% for RDTY.
Find the right allocation for ARMW and RDTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer