ARMW vs. PEPS
ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
ARMW vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 363.23% return, which is significantly higher than PEPS's 10.67% return.
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.67% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMW and PEPS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMW vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMW
PEPS
ARMW vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMW | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.96 | 1.05 | +3.91 |
Drawdowns
ARMW vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMW | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -21.26% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.55% | -2.77% | -23.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
ARMW vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMW | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.46% | 13.06% | +75.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.46% | 18.31% | +70.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.46% | 18.31% | +70.15% |
ARMW vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMW vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMW and PEPS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for ARMW and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer