ARMW vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

ARMW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 161.70% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 10.19% return.

ARMW

• 1D: -7.36%
• 1M: -40.52%
• 6M: 177.20%
• YTD: 161.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 10.96%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 1Y: 15.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	161.70%	-41.28%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	10.19%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMW and OMAH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.05

ARMW vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARMW	OMAH
Technology	20.0%	11.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	19.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.2%
Energy	-	8.8%
Financial Services	-	37.3%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARMW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 77
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 69
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.94	—

Drawdowns

ARMW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMW	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-11.83%	-36.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.33%	0.00%	-47.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-1.24%	-24.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMW	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.20%	8.18%	+87.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.20%	12.88%	+82.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.20%	12.88%	+82.32%

ARMW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.52%, more than OMAH's 14.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	50.52%	16.38%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.80%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMW and OMAH in my portfolio?

ARMW and OMAH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMW or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMW or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMW or OMAH?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 50.52%, compared with 14.80% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between ARMW and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.95% for OMAH.