ARMW vs. MAGO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGO (Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

ARMW vs. MAGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF (MAGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 297.09% return, which is significantly higher than MAGO's -5.64% return.

ARMW

• 1D: -13.02%
• 1M: 22.00%
• YTD: 297.09%
• 6M: 286.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGO

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -10.07%
• YTD: -5.64%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMW vs. MAGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	297.09%	-0.71%
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF	-5.64%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMW and MAGO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

ARMW vs. MAGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF (MAGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ARMW vs. MAGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than MAGO's maximum drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and MAGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMW	MAGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-18.21%	-30.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.08%	-12.08%	-8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.29%	-5.68%	-19.61%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMW	MAGO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.74%	24.22%	+70.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.74%	24.22%	+70.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.74%	24.22%	+70.52%

ARMW vs. MAGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARMW and MAGO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

ARMW vs. MAGO - Dividend Comparison

ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.98%, more than MAGO's 8.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	25.98%	16.38%
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF	8.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMW and MAGO in my portfolio?

ARMW and MAGO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMW or MAGO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMW or MAGO?

ARMW and MAGO have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMW or MAGO?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 25.98%, compared with 8.00% for MAGO.

What is the main difference between ARMW and MAGO?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Tuttle.