ARMW vs. EDGQ
ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDGQ.
Performance
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMW
- 1D
- -13.02%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 297.09%
- 6M
- 286.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 235.89% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 15.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMW and EDGQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than EDGQ's maximum drawdown of -7.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and EDGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMW | EDGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.47% | -7.87% | -40.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.08% | -3.76% | -16.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.29% | -1.53% | -23.76% |
Volatility
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMW | EDGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.74% | 19.83% | +74.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.74% | 19.83% | +74.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.74% | 19.83% | +74.91% |
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGQ's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMW vs. EDGQ - Dividend Comparison
ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.98%, more than EDGQ's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 25.98% | 16.38% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 4.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMW and EDGQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 25.98%, compared with 4.26% for EDGQ.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.53% for EDGQ.
Find the right allocation for ARMW and EDGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer