ARMW vs. DYLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ARMW is actively managed, while DYLG is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DYLG.

Performance

ARMW vs. DYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 363.23% return, which is significantly higher than DYLG's 4.63% return.

ARMW

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 128.75%
• YTD: 363.23%
• 6M: 245.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DYLG

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMW vs. DYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	363.23%	-40.49%
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	4.63%	3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMW and DYLG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.44

ARMW vs. DYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARMW	DYLG
Technology	36.0%	17.1%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Communication Services	-	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	2.4%
Financial Services	-	27.2%
Healthcare	-	13.1%
Industrials	-	18.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARMW vs. DYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLG

DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 53
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMW vs. DYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMW	DYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.96	1.10	+3.85

Drawdowns

ARMW vs. DYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, which is greater than DYLG's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and DYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMW	DYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.47%	-13.98%	-34.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.65%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.55%	-1.86%	-24.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMW	DYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.46%	9.44%	+79.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.46%	11.44%	+77.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.46%	11.44%	+77.02%

ARMW vs. DYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMW vs. DYLG - Dividend Comparison

ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%, more than DYLG's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	15.20%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	9.54%	9.63%	16.55%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMW and DYLG in my portfolio?

ARMW and DYLG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ARMW or DYLG?

On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARMW or DYLG?

DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARMW or DYLG?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 9.54% for DYLG.

What is the main difference between ARMW and DYLG?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.35% for DYLG.