ARMGX vs. MCEMX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ARMGX (Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund) and MCEMX (Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - ARMGX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Legg Mason, while MCEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, ARMGX returned 2.22%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for MCEMX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMGX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MCEMX.

Performance

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) and Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMGX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than MCEMX's 25.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ARMGX has underperformed MCEMX with an annualized return of 2.22%, while MCEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.75% annualized return.

ARMGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 3.48%
• 3Y*: 4.34%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

MCEMX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 25.07%
• 6M: 27.08%
• 1Y: 50.78%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund	1.07%	4.20%	4.67%	5.25%	-1.91%	0.06%	0.80%	3.38%	0.91%	3.09%
MCEMX Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund	25.07%	36.77%	2.89%	6.28%	-26.82%	-5.00%	27.81%	29.29%	-18.82%	47.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMGX and MCEMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.14

Return for Risk

ARMGX vs. MCEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMGX

ARMGX Risk / Return Rank: 98
ARMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ARMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ARMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ARMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ARMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

MCEMX

MCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 78
MCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
MCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
MCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) and Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARMGX	MCEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	2.13	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.74	2.62	+4.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.43	1.41	+1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.73	3.59	+7.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.31	13.61	+33.70

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the MCEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARMGX and MCEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMGX drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, smaller than the maximum MCEMX drawdown of -46.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMGX and MCEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMGX	MCEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.79%	-46.45%	+24.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.33%	-14.34%	+14.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.55%	-18.19%	+17.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.23%	-43.05%	+39.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.09%	-46.45%	+37.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-5.53%	+5.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-17.04%	+15.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	3.78%	-3.71%

Volatility

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) is 0.39%, while Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund (MCEMX) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that ARMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARMGX	MCEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	14.32%	-13.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.87%	22.22%	-21.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19%	24.34%	-23.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.26%	20.55%	-19.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.62%	20.42%	-18.80%

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than MCEMX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMGX vs. MCEMX - Dividend Comparison

ARMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than MCEMX's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund	2.87%	3.00%	2.43%	2.23%	1.37%	0.17%	1.45%	2.32%	1.92%	1.37%	0.96%	0.48%
MCEMX Martin Currie Emerging Markets Fund	0.49%	0.68%	0.62%	1.41%	0.70%	0.23%	0.54%	2.54%	1.03%	0.17%	2.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARMGX and MCEMX in my portfolio?

ARMGX and MCEMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARMGX or MCEMX?

MCEMX has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to ARMGX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMGX dropped -21.79% vs MCEMX's -46.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.