ARMGX vs. CBUDX
ARMGX (Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund) and CBUDX (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, ARMGX returned 4.42%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for CBUDX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMGX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for CBUDX.
Performance
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARMGX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CBUDX's 1.54% return.
ARMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
CBUDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund | 1.18% | 4.20% | 4.67% | 5.25% | -1.91% | 0.20% |
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 1.54% | 5.25% | 5.83% | 5.61% | 2.25% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMGX and CBUDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMGX vs. CBUDX — Risk / Return Rank
ARMGX
CBUDX
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARMGX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.64 | 4.55 | -1.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.77 | 11.64 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.56 | 79.04 | -25.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMGX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | 5.56 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 4.61 | -3.49 |
Drawdowns
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMGX drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, which is greater than CBUDX's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMGX and CBUDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMGX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -0.40% | -21.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.33% | -0.40% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.55% | -0.40% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -0.03% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 0.06% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund (ARMGX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX) at 0.26%. This indicates that ARMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMGX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 0.26% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 0.67% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19% | 0.84% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 0.92% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.62% | 0.92% | +0.70% |
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMGX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUDX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMGX vs. CBUDX - Dividend Comparison
ARMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than CBUDX's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMGX Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund | 2.86% | 3.00% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.37% | 0.17% | 1.45% | 2.32% | 1.92% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 0.48% |
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 4.45% | 4.61% | 5.68% | 5.67% | 2.94% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMGX and CBUDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMGX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to CBUDX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARMGX dropped -21.79% vs CBUDX's -0.40%.
CBUDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARMGX and CBUDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer