ARKW vs. TPLC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. ARKW is actively managed, while TPLC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKW returned -1.45%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for TPLC. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TPLC.

Performance

ARKW vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than TPLC's 9.90% return.

ARKW

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: -6.26%
• 6M: -8.97%
• 1Y: -4.08%
• 3Y*: 36.01%
• 5Y*: -1.45%
• 10Y*: 22.34%

TPLC

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 8.33%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	-6.26%	38.93%	42.27%	96.89%	-67.49%	-18.85%	157.44%	7.91%
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund	9.90%	7.08%	13.10%	15.17%	-12.58%	26.34%	14.55%	8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and TPLC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2019	0.62

The correlation between ARKW and TPLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ARKW vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKW	TPLC
Technology	44.0%	19.0%
Communication Services	14.6%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	8.6%
Financial Services	14.1%	11.6%
Industrials	4.9%	22.6%
Basic Materials	-	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.6%
Energy	-	7.6%
Healthcare	-	9.5%
Real Estate	-	0.2%
Utilities	-	11.0%

Return for Risk

ARKW vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 8
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

TPLC

TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 34
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKW	TPLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	1.07	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	1.59	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.19	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	1.65	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	5.86	-6.08

ARKW vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKW Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the TPLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKW and TPLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than TPLC's maximum drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and TPLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKW	TPLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.52%	-38.02%	-42.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.21%	-7.58%	-28.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.21%	-18.18%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.36%	-21.63%	-55.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.87%	-0.37%	-24.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.97%	-5.26%	-18.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.20%	2.13%	+16.07%

Volatility

ARKW vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 3.40%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKW	TPLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	3.40%	+7.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.67%	8.74%	+15.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.81%	11.74%	+21.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.65%	16.16%	+27.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.78%	19.85%	+17.93%

ARKW vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKW vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than TPLC's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.70%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund	0.85%	0.89%	0.88%	0.89%	1.06%	0.61%	0.81%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKW and TPLC in my portfolio?

ARKW and TPLC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKW or TPLC?

ARKW has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to TPLC (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs TPLC's -38.02%.

Which ETF is better, ARKW or TPLC?

On 5-year performance, TPLC leads with 8.32% vs -1.45% for ARKW. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKW or TPLC?

Over the 5-year period, TPLC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKW or TPLC?

TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKW or TPLC?

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.85% for TPLC.

What is the main difference between ARKW and TPLC?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.52% for TPLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.