ARKW vs. TPLC
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. ARKW is actively managed, while TPLC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKW returned 1.89%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for TPLC. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TPLC.
Performance
ARKW vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than TPLC's 8.78% return.
ARKW
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.99%
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKW vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -0.79% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 8.05% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 7.08% | 13.10% | 15.17% | -12.58% | 26.34% | 14.55% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and TPLC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ARKW and TPLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKW vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
TPLC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
TPLC
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
TPLC
Communication Services
ARKW
TPLC
Financial Services
ARKW
TPLC
Industrials
ARKW
TPLC
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
TPLC
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
TPLC
Energy
ARKW
-
TPLC
Healthcare
ARKW
-
TPLC
Real Estate
ARKW
-
TPLC
Utilities
ARKW
-
TPLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
TPLC
ARKW vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKW | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.67 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 5.94 | -4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKW | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.10 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.51 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than TPLC's maximum drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and TPLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -38.02% | -42.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -7.58% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -18.18% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -21.63% | -55.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.48% | -0.12% | -20.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -5.29% | -18.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.52% | 2.13% | +15.39% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 2.70%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 2.70% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.54% | 8.45% | +15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.93% | 11.50% | +21.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.49% | 16.14% | +27.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 19.89% | +17.80% |
ARKW vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than TPLC's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.60% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and TPLC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs TPLC's -38.02%.
On 5-year performance, TPLC leads with 8.22% vs 1.89% for ARKW. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPLC has performed better with a 8.22% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.84% for TPLC.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.52% for TPLC.
TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and TPLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer