PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKW vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKW vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARKW

1D
-2.98%
1M
2.53%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-3.36%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
40.12%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
22.99%

FEMG

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKW vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARKW and FEMG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.65

ARKW vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKW
FEMG

Technology

44.2%
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
17.4%

Communication Services

15.0%
2.7%

Financial Services

14.2%
6.0%

Industrials

1.7%
26.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

12.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

ARKW
44.2%
FEMG
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKW
16.3%
FEMG
17.4%

Communication Services

ARKW
15.0%
FEMG
2.7%

Financial Services

ARKW
14.2%
FEMG
6.0%

Industrials

ARKW
1.7%
FEMG
26.5%

Basic Materials

ARKW

-

FEMG
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

ARKW

-

FEMG
1.4%

Energy

ARKW

-

FEMG
3.3%

Healthcare

ARKW

-

FEMG
12.6%

Real Estate

ARKW

-

FEMG
1.8%

Utilities

ARKW

-

FEMG
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKW vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKW vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKWFEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

ARKW vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKWFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

4.78

-4.21

Drawdowns

ARKW vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKWFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-3.29%

-77.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.48%

-1.18%

-19.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-0.96%

-23.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.52%

Volatility

ARKW vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKWFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.93%

12.29%

+20.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.49%

12.29%

+31.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.69%

12.29%

+25.40%

ARKW vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKW vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.60%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKW and FEMG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKW and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer