ARKW vs. FEMG
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FEMG.
Performance
ARKW vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKW
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.99%
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKW vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 6.99% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and FEMG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.65 |
ARKW vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
FEMG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
FEMG
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
FEMG
Communication Services
ARKW
FEMG
Financial Services
ARKW
FEMG
Industrials
ARKW
FEMG
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
FEMG
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
FEMG
Energy
ARKW
-
FEMG
Healthcare
ARKW
-
FEMG
Real Estate
ARKW
-
FEMG
Utilities
ARKW
-
FEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
FEMG
ARKW vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKW | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKW | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 4.78 | -4.21 |
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and FEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -3.29% | -77.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.48% | -1.18% | -19.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -0.96% | -23.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.52% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKW vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | FEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.93% | 12.29% | +20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.49% | 12.29% | +31.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 12.29% | +25.40% |
ARKW vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.60% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and FEMG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.23% for FEMG.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and FEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer