ARKW vs. BTEK
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and BTEK (Future Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while BTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BTEK.
Performance
ARKW vs. BTEK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKW
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -4.77%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 22.88%
BTEK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKW vs. BTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -0.87% | 38.93% | 43.65% |
BTEK Future Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARKW vs. BTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
BTEK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ARKW
BTEK
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
BTEK
Communication Services
ARKW
BTEK
Financial Services
ARKW
BTEK
-
Industrials
ARKW
BTEK
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Energy
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Healthcare
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Real Estate
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Utilities
ARKW
-
BTEK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. BTEK — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
BTEK
ARKW vs. BTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Future Tech ETF (BTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKW | BTEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKW | BTEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. BTEK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | BTEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.55% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.55% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKW vs. BTEK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | BTEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.86% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.49% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.68% | — | — |
ARKW vs. BTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEK's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. BTEK - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while BTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.61% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
BTEK Future Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BTEK.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for BTEK.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BTEK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.88% for BTEK.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and BTEK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer