PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKT vs. ZMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF (ARKT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKT achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAY's 2.20% return.


ARKT

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.09%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMAY

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.77%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARKT and ZMAY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKT vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKT

ZMAY
ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF (ARKT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKTZMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

4.24

-4.84

Drawdowns

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKT drawdown since its inception was -18.78%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKT and ZMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKTZMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.78%

-0.39%

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.28%

-0.06%

-10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-0.05%

-10.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKTZMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

1.45%

+17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

1.52%

+17.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

1.52%

+17.19%

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMAY's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKT vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

ARKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while ZMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARKT and ZMAY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMAY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMAY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for ARKT.

ARKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for ZMAY.

They also come from different issuers: ARK Invest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for ARKT and 0.79% for ZMAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKT and ZMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer