PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKT vs. TMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKT vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF (ARKT) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKT achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 14.45% return.


ARKT

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.09%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMAR

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.73%
YTD
14.45%
6M
15.92%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKT vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ARKT
ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF
1.09%-8.65%
TMAR
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March
14.45%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKT and TMAR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKT vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKT

TMAR
TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKT vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF (ARKT) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARKT vs. TMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKTTMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

2.25

-2.86

Drawdowns

ARKT vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKT drawdown since its inception was -18.78%, which is greater than TMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKT and TMAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKTTMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.78%

-9.93%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.28%

-0.72%

-9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-0.66%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

ARKT vs. TMAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKTTMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

9.47%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

11.42%

+7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

11.42%

+7.29%

ARKT vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKT vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison

ARKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while TMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARKT and TMAR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARKT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARKT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

ARKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for TMAR.

They also come from different issuers: ARK Invest and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for ARKT and 0.95% for TMAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKT and TMAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer