ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L
ARKI.L (ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds. ARKI.L is actively managed, while FOGB.L is passively managed. Over the past year, ARKI.L returned 20.46% vs -3.10% for FOGB.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKI.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.
Performance
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARKI.L is traded in USD, while FOGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKI.L achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 4.43% return.
ARKI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- 20.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- -3.10%
- 3Y*
- -3.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKI.L ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 7.36% | 38.42% | 59.31% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 4.43% | -2.66% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKI.L and FOGB.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
ARKI.L
FOGB.L
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (ARKI.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKI.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | -0.12 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | -0.21 | +2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKI.L drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKI.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKI.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.97% | -47.61% | +16.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -15.90% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -40.01% | +32.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.53% | -28.74% | +22.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 8.83% | +0.93% |
Volatility
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
ARK Artificial Intelligence & Robotics UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (ARKI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that ARKI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKI.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 3.95% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.01% | 11.30% | +10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.86% | 15.97% | +13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.04% | 18.14% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.04% | 17.70% | +13.34% |
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKI.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKI.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKI.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKI.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKI.L.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKI.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for ARKI.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer