ARKG vs. SPAQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARKG returned 0.67%/yr vs 5.87%/yr for SPAQ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAQ.

Performance

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKG achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than SPAQ's 2.81% return.

ARKG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 53.35%
• 3Y*: 0.67%
• 5Y*: -15.72%
• 10Y*: 7.22%

SPAQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	17.09%	23.04%	-28.24%	0.34%
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	2.81%	7.35%	4.33%	5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKG and SPAQ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023	0.08

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKG	SPAQ
Healthcare	99.2%	-
Financial Services	0.5%	91.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKG vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKG

ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 35
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SPAQ

SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 20
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARKG	SPAQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.57	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.84	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	0.94	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.67	3.39	+1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the SPAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKG and SPAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARKG	SPAQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.57	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.86	-0.73

Drawdowns

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKG drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKG and SPAQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKG	SPAQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.59%	-5.30%	-78.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.51%	-5.30%	-22.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.96%	-5.30%	-46.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.65%	-0.01%	-69.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.87%	-0.54%	-35.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.46%	1.47%	+9.99%

Volatility

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison

ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.95%. This indicates that ARKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKG	SPAQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.90%	1.95%	+9.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.77%	5.01%	+23.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.12%	8.80%	+32.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.61%	7.00%	+38.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.12%	7.00%	+34.12%

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKG vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison

ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	0.85%	3.14%	0.82%	1.34%
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	16.23%	16.69%	3.00%	2.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKG and SPAQ in my portfolio?

ARKG and SPAQ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKG or SPAQ?

ARKG has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKG dropped -83.59% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.

Which ETF is better, ARKG or SPAQ?

On 3-year performance, SPAQ leads with 5.87% vs 0.67% for ARKG. On fees, ARKG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKG or SPAQ?

Over the 3-year period, SPAQ has performed better with a 5.87% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKG or SPAQ?

ARKG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKG or SPAQ?

SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

What is the main difference between ARKG and SPAQ?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKG and 0.85% for SPAQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.