ARKG vs. IHE
ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) and IHE (iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. ARKG is actively managed, while IHE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKG returned 8.67%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for IHE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IHE.
Performance
ARKG vs. IHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKG achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly higher than IHE's 11.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARKG having a 8.67% annualized return and IHE not far ahead at 8.99%.
ARKG
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 24.30%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 52.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -16.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
IHE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 46.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
ARKG vs. IHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 24.30% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 180.40% | 44.00% | -1.26% | 46.61% |
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 11.65% | 31.69% | 8.13% | 1.06% | -4.87% | 13.07% | 13.66% | 15.47% | -7.76% | 10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKG and IHE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ARKG and IHE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKG vs. IHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKG
IHE
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
ARKG
IHE
Financial Services
ARKG
IHE
-
Basic Materials
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Communication Services
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Energy
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Industrials
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Real Estate
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Technology
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Utilities
ARKG
-
IHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKG vs. IHE — Risk / Return Rank
ARKG
IHE
ARKG vs. IHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKG | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.46 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 5.56 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 17.09 | -12.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKG vs. IHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKG drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than IHE's maximum drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKG and IHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKG | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | -38.20% | -45.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.51% | -8.47% | -19.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.96% | -15.92% | -36.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.18% | -16.03% | -64.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.59% | -29.59% | -54.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.78% | -0.70% | -67.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.02% | -7.90% | -28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 2.75% | +8.78% |
Volatility
ARKG vs. IHE - Volatility Comparison
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) at 5.27%. This indicates that ARKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKG | IHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.19% | 5.27% | +9.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.91% | 12.68% | +18.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.54% | 17.22% | +25.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.93% | 16.28% | +29.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.29% | 18.05% | +23.24% |
ARKG vs. IHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IHE's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKG vs. IHE - Dividend Comparison
ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHE iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.73% | 1.39% | 2.01% | 1.49% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 1.25% | 1.36% | 0.92% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKG and IHE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKG has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to IHE (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKG dropped -83.59% vs IHE's -38.20%.
On 10-year performance, IHE leads with 8.99% vs 8.67% for ARKG. On fees, IHE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHE has performed better with a 8.99% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKG and 0.42% for IHE.
IHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKG and IHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer