ARKG vs. FTXH
ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. ARKG is actively managed, while FTXH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ARKG returned -15.72%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for FTXH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
ARKG vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKG achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than FTXH's 5.00% return.
ARKG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 53.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -15.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKG vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 17.09% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 180.40% | 44.00% | -1.26% | 46.61% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 5.00% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -1.41% | 2.55% | 6.14% | 11.73% | 22.13% | -9.51% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKG and FTXH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ARKG and FTXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKG vs. FTXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKG
FTXH
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
ARKG
FTXH
Financial Services
ARKG
FTXH
-
Basic Materials
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Communication Services
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Energy
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Industrials
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Real Estate
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Technology
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Utilities
ARKG
-
FTXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKG vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
ARKG
FTXH
ARKG vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKG | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 4.87 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | 14.07 | -9.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKG | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 2.14 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.48 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.38 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ARKG vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKG drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKG and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKG | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | -32.11% | -51.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.51% | -7.47% | -20.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.96% | -19.51% | -32.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.18% | -19.51% | -60.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.65% | -2.88% | -66.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.87% | -5.84% | -30.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 2.58% | +8.88% |
Volatility
ARKG vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) at 4.83%. This indicates that ARKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKG | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 4.83% | +7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 11.73% | +17.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.12% | 16.98% | +24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 16.31% | +29.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 18.41% | +22.71% |
ARKG vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKG vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% | 0.00% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKG and FTXH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKG has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to FTXH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKG dropped -83.59% vs FTXH's -32.11%.
On 5-year performance, FTXH leads with 7.80% vs -15.72% for ARKG. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 7.80% return vs -15.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKG and 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKG and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer