ARKG vs. BTEC
ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. ARKG is actively managed, while BTEC is passively managed. ARKG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
ARKG vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 53.35%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -15.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKG vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 17.82% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
ARKG vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKG
BTEC
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
ARKG
BTEC
Financial Services
ARKG
BTEC
-
Basic Materials
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Energy
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
ARKG
-
BTEC
Real Estate
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Technology
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
ARKG
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKG vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
ARKG
BTEC
ARKG vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKG | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKG | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ARKG vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKG drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKG and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKG | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | 0.00% | -83.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.65% | 0.00% | -69.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.87% | 0.00% | -35.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKG vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKG | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.12% | 0.00% | +41.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 0.00% | +45.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 0.00% | +41.12% |
ARKG vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKG vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKG nor BTEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
ARKG and BTEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKG and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for ARKG and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer