PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKD vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKD vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARKD

1D
1.76%
1M
2.65%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZBC

1D
-2.81%
1M
-22.22%
YTD
-27.45%
6M
-31.45%
1Y
-39.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKD vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARKD and EZBC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKD vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKD

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKD vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARKD vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKDEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.27

-0.31

Drawdowns

ARKD vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and EZBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKDEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-49.50%

+35.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.83%

-49.50%

+46.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-16.07%

+9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.59%

Volatility

ARKD vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKDEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

43.71%

-23.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

50.05%

-30.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

50.05%

-30.15%

ARKD vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKD vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARKD nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKD and EZBC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

ARKD and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.19% for EZBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKD and EZBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer