PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARHBX vs. CSGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
4.75%18.32%8.34%20.65%-2.64%
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
5.85%15.11%10.21%13.62%-5.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARHBX achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than CSGIX's 5.85% return.


ARHBX

1D
1.71%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
4.75%
6M
3.88%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
12.23%
5Y*
10Y*

CSGIX

1D
2.93%
1M
-11.15%
YTD
5.85%
6M
-2.51%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARHBX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CSGIX's 2.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ARHBX vs. CSGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARHBX
ARHBX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ARHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ARHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CSGIX
CSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARHBXCSGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.93

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.92

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

5.19

-0.18

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the CSGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARHBX and CSGIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARHBXCSGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.30

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between ARHBX and CSGIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Dividend Comparison

ARHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than CSGIX's 1.16% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
7.10%7.44%4.86%1.97%0.16%
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
1.16%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.71%

Drawdowns

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARHBX drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, smaller than the maximum CSGIX drawdown of -26.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARHBX and CSGIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ARHBXCSGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-26.50%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-13.68%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-11.15%

+7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-10.62%

+7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

5.06%

-1.79%

Volatility

ARHBX vs. CSGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) is 6.44%, while Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that ARHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ARHBXCSGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

9.38%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

14.22%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

18.64%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

17.10%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

17.10%

-3.22%