PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARFVX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARFVX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ARFVX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 9.51%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


ARFVX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.80%
YTD
7.35%
6M
8.20%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
9.51%

LTFIX

1D
0.69%
1M
3.98%
YTD
9.21%
6M
10.05%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
7.35%14.75%11.30%15.16%-17.44%13.36%17.43%24.02%-5.24%16.43%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
9.21%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ARFVX and LTFIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2008

0.98

The correlation between ARFVX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARFVX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARFVX
ARFVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARFVXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

1.98

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

2.79

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.67

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.63

12.03

-1.40

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARFVX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARFVXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.98

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.60

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Drawdowns

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARFVX drawdown since its inception was -47.41%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARFVX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARFVXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.41%

-52.73%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-8.71%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-15.70%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-26.80%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.55%

-33.50%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-7.64%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.93%

-0.12%

Volatility

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) is 2.74%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that ARFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARFVXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

3.35%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

9.46%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

11.86%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.46%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

15.84%

-2.24%

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARFVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARFVX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

ARFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.42%, more than LTFIX's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
13.42%14.41%4.91%1.96%6.71%7.57%6.52%8.66%10.95%1.22%3.88%6.89%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
7.99%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ARFVX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to ARFVX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARFVX dropped -47.41% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

ARFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARFVX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer