PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARFVX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARFVX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 14.07% return.


ARFVX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.40%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.02%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.53%

FQLSX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.07%
6M
15.67%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
7.56%14.75%11.30%15.16%-17.44%13.36%17.43%24.02%-5.24%6.87%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
14.07%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ARFVX and FQLSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.97

The correlation between ARFVX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARFVX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARFVX
ARFVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARFVXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.36

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

14.85

-4.29

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARFVX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARFVXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.54

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.78

-0.31

Drawdowns

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARFVX drawdown since its inception was -47.41%, which is greater than FQLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARFVX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARFVXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.41%

-31.26%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-9.48%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-15.37%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-27.41%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-5.43%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.14%

-0.33%

Volatility

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) is 2.73%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that ARFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARFVXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

4.13%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

10.29%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

12.54%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.12%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

16.08%

-2.48%

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARFVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARFVX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

ARFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.40%, more than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
13.40%14.41%4.91%1.96%6.71%7.57%6.52%8.66%10.95%1.22%3.88%6.89%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.59%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ARFVX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to ARFVX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARFVX dropped -47.41% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARFVX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer