PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARFVX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARFVX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ARFVX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.28% annualized return.


ARFVX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.40%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.02%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.53%

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
7.56%14.75%11.30%15.16%-17.44%13.36%17.43%24.02%-5.24%16.43%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ARFVX and FFGZX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.74

The correlation between ARFVX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (10 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARFVX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARFVX
ARFVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARFVXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.64

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

3.97

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.18

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.56

14.23

-3.67

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARFVX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARFVXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.64

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.97

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.93

-0.46

Drawdowns

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARFVX drawdown since its inception was -47.41%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARFVX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARFVXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.41%

-14.94%

-32.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-3.33%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-4.76%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-14.94%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.55%

-14.94%

-14.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-2.26%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

0.74%

+1.07%

Volatility

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that ARFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARFVXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.49%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

3.34%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

4.01%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

5.08%

+7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

4.43%

+9.17%

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARFVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARFVX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

ARFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.40%, more than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
13.40%14.41%4.91%1.96%6.71%7.57%6.52%8.66%10.95%1.22%3.88%6.89%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARFVX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARFVX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARFVX dropped -47.41% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARFVX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer