ARCNX vs. QHFIX
ARCNX (AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N) and QHFIX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - ARCNX is a Commodities fund managed by AQR, while QHFIX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARCNX charges 1.28%/yr vs 6.69%/yr for QHFIX.
Performance
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than QHFIX's 3.97% return.
ARCNX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 21.24%
- 6M
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 40.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
QHFIX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N | 21.24% | 5.43% |
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 3.97% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCNX and QHFIX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCNX vs. QHFIX — Risk / Return Rank
ARCNX
QHFIX
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARCNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.86 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARCNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.04 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, which is greater than QHFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and QHFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.17% | -13.85% | -41.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | 0.00% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -5.07% | -20.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCNX | QHFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 16.47% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 16.47% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 16.47% | +0.97% |
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFIX's 6.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARCNX vs. QHFIX - Dividend Comparison
ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, while QHFIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCNX AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N | 11.19% | 13.57% | 1.89% | 7.45% | 9.45% | 18.31% | 0.09% | 4.98% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 4.69% |
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCNX and QHFIX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ARCNX and QHFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer