PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCNX vs. PCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCNX achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly lower than PCLAX's 34.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ARCNX has underperformed PCLAX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while PCLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.


ARCNX

1D
0.29%
1M
5.32%
6M
7.37%
YTD
16.04%
1Y
33.40%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
4.59%

PCLAX

1D
-0.38%
1M
9.82%
6M
25.28%
YTD
34.00%
1Y
38.61%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
16.04%20.76%7.19%-0.50%20.97%39.48%8.11%17.68%-17.83%10.20%
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.00%4.13%5.76%-0.14%22.73%43.18%-9.67%19.19%-12.47%10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCNX and PCLAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.76

The correlation between ARCNX and PCLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCNX vs. PCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARCNX
ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLAX
PCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCNXPCLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.30

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

7.74

-0.67

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the PCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCNX and PCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCNX drawdown since its inception was -55.17%, smaller than the maximum PCLAX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCNX and PCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCNXPCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.17%

-68.19%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.52%

-15.53%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-15.53%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-21.75%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-52.00%

+19.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.22%

-6.58%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-25.49%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

4.63%

-0.18%

Volatility

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) is 4.80%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLAX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that ARCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCNXPCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.99%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

17.85%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

19.98%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

19.59%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

40.63%

-23.18%

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCNX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARCNX vs. PCLAX - Dividend Comparison

ARCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, more than PCLAX's 10.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
11.69%13.57%1.89%7.45%9.45%18.31%0.09%4.98%0.29%0.01%4.69%0.00%
PCLAX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.83%1.20%5.20%4.58%44.24%75.67%0.45%2.07%18.31%12.18%0.09%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCNX and PCLAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLAX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to ARCNX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCNX dropped -55.17% vs PCLAX's -68.19%.

ARCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCNX and PCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer