ARCM vs. QBF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ARCM (Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both exchange-traded funds - ARCM is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Arrow Funds, while QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARCM returned 3.54% vs -42.47% for QBF. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARCM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.

Performance

ARCM vs. QBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCM achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than QBF's -28.48% return.

ARCM

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 1.59%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 1Y: 3.54%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.40%

QBF

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 1.51%
• 6M: -25.66%
• YTD: -28.48%
• 1Y: -42.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -28.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARCM Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF	$15.57K	$12.65K	$44.13K
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	$57.51K	$91.87K	$133.71K

ARCM vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARCM Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF	1.89%	3.67%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-28.48%	-14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCM and QBF is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

ARCM vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARCM

ARCM Risk / Return Rank: 99
ARCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ARCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ARCM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ARCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ARCM Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QBF

QBF Risk / Return Rank: 0
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARCM vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARCM	QBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.48	-1.62	+10.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	17.84	-2.55	+20.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.40	0.73	+3.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.15	-0.90	+30.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	239.57	-1.45	+241.02

ARCM vs. QBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCM Sharpe Ratio is 8.48, which is higher than the QBF Sharpe Ratio of -1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCM and QBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARCM vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCM drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum QBF drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCM and QBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARCM	QBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-48.71%	+44.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.12%	-48.71%	+48.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-46.54%	+46.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.72%	-19.89%	+19.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	30.27%	-30.25%

Volatility

ARCM vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF (ARCM) is 0.07%, while Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that ARCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARCM	QBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.07%	6.30%	-6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.28%	19.72%	-19.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44%	27.26%	-26.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.02%	28.70%	-25.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.11%	28.70%	-25.59%

ARCM vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARCM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARCM vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison

ARCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than QBF's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARCM Arrow Reserve Capital Management ETF	3.62%	4.13%	4.87%	4.26%	0.90%	0.02%	0.84%	2.32%	1.91%	0.62%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	1.93%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARCM and QBF in my portfolio?

ARCM and QBF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARCM or QBF?

QBF has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to ARCM (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCM dropped -4.08% vs QBF's -48.71%.

Which ETF is better, ARCM or QBF?

On 1-year performance, ARCM leads with 3.54% vs -42.47% for QBF. On fees, ARCM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ARCM has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARCM or QBF?

Over the 1-year period, ARCM has performed better with a 3.54% return vs -42.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARCM or QBF?

ARCM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARCM or QBF?

ARCM has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.93% for QBF.

What is the main difference between ARCM and QBF?

ARCM is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while QBF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ARCM and 0.79% for QBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.48 vs -1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.