ARBIX vs. CSQAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares (ARBIX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX).
ARBIX is an actively managed fund by Absolute Investment Advisers. It was launched on Aug 14, 2017. CSQAX is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Beta Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2012.
Performance
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARBIX Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares | 1.65% | 8.29% | 7.53% | 5.30% | -0.53% | 2.95% | 9.28% | 6.38% | 2.07% | 8,411.75% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.07% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 1.72% | 5.52% | 9.98% | 6.10% | 2.88% | -4.31% | 2.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARBIX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSQAX's 1.07% return.
ARBIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CSQAX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- -1.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARBIX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQAX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ARBIX vs. CSQAX — Risk / Return Rank
ARBIX
CSQAX
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares (ARBIX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARBIX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.20 | -0.18 | +6.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 11.37 | -0.19 | +11.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.06 | 0.98 | +2.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.19 | -0.20 | +15.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.66 | -0.31 | +70.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARBIX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.20 | -0.18 | +6.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.59 | 0.44 | +2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.49 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARBIX and CSQAX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Dividend Comparison
ARBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than CSQAX's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARBIX Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares | 5.25% | 5.34% | 4.87% | 3.62% | 3.33% | 3.12% | 2.92% | 2.83% | 1.97% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.07% | 1.09% | 6.54% | 2.73% | 2.59% | 9.06% | 13.23% | 4.77% | 1.84% | 5.27% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARBIX drawdown since its inception was -4.31%, smaller than the maximum CSQAX drawdown of -8.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARBIX and CSQAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARBIX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -8.37% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.51% | -5.05% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.02% | -7.28% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -4.58% | +4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -2.07% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 3.17% | -3.06% |
Volatility
ARBIX vs. CSQAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Absolute Convertible Arbitrage Fund Institutional Shares (ARBIX) is 0.47%, while Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that ARBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARBIX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 3.05% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.90% | 5.76% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 7.59% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 6.33% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 745.92% | 5.98% | +739.94% |