AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L
AQWG.L (Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF) and RAYG.L (Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - AQWG.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while RAYG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AQWG.L returned 7.66%/yr vs -4.78%/yr for RAYG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AQWG.L achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than RAYG.L's 21.50% return.
AQWG.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAYG.L
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 21.50%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 84.67%
- 3Y*
- -4.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQWG.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF | -0.99% | 5.17% | 7.79% | 18.26% | 5.44% |
RAYG.L Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 21.50% | 30.23% | -27.04% | -36.40% | 16.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQWG.L and RAYG.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.28 |
The correlation between AQWG.L and RAYG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AQWG.L
RAYG.L
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L) and Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RAYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQWG.L | RAYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 5.82 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 14.72 | -14.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQWG.L | RAYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 2.69 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.11 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQWG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.03%, smaller than the maximum RAYG.L drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWG.L and RAYG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQWG.L | RAYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.03% | -71.14% | +48.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -14.48% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | -58.12% | +40.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -42.21% | +32.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -42.80% | +35.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 5.73% | -1.24% |
Volatility
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L) is 3.98%, while Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RAYG.L) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that AQWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQWG.L | RAYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 8.58% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 21.55% | -11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 31.33% | -18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 32.59% | -17.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 32.59% | -17.59% |
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AQWG.L and RAYG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
AQWG.L vs. RAYG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AQWG.L nor RAYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AQWG.L and RAYG.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AQWG.L and RAYG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
AQWG.L is categorized as Water Equities, while RAYG.L is Energy Equities. AQWG.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while RAYG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.
Find the right allocation for AQWG.L and RAYG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer