PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQWA vs. DYNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AQWA vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AQWA vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
2.38%13.15%4.34%20.13%-19.89%15.85%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
-3.16%20.00%30.29%36.25%-20.27%9.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQWA achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than DYNF's -3.16% return.


AQWA

1D
1.25%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
2.38%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
10Y*

DYNF

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AQWA vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AQWA vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQWA
AQWA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AQWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQWA vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AQWADYNFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.17

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

1.73

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.90

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.17

8.99

-4.82

AQWA vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQWA and DYNF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AQWADYNFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.17

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.73

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between AQWA and DYNF is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AQWA vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

AQWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than DYNF's 1.02% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
1.44%1.47%1.40%1.53%1.56%1.20%0.00%0.00%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
1.02%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%

Drawdowns

AQWA vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQWA drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA and DYNF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AQWADYNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-34.72%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.45%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-4.94%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-6.11%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.42%

+1.09%

Volatility

AQWA vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) have volatilities of 5.57% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AQWADYNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

5.59%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

10.02%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

18.21%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

17.49%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

20.05%

-3.38%