PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQWA.L achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than DH2O.L's 2.64% return.


AQWA.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.43%
6M
-0.91%
YTD
1.75%
1Y
2.14%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
10Y*

DH2O.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.85%
6M
0.83%
YTD
2.64%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AQWA.L
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.75%12.96%5.98%25.16%-19.37%1.47%
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.64%17.60%4.29%13.57%-20.83%3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AQWA.L and DH2O.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021

0.88

The correlation between AQWA.L and DH2O.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQWA.L
AQWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AQWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DH2O.L
DH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AQWA.LDH2O.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

0.66

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

1.53

-0.84

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQWA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQWA.L and DH2O.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQWA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.61%, smaller than the maximum DH2O.L drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQWA.L and DH2O.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQWA.LDH2O.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.61%

-56.90%

+28.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-10.53%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-16.08%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.72%

-5.23%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-10.39%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

4.58%

+0.98%

Volatility

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQWA.LDH2O.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.04%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

10.79%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

13.58%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.74%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.48%

+0.84%

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQWA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQWA.L vs. DH2O.L - Dividend Comparison

AQWA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQWA.L
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.36%1.33%1.06%1.18%1.09%1.66%0.94%1.39%1.80%1.46%1.76%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AQWA.L and DH2O.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AQWA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AQWA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DH2O.L.

AQWA.L is categorized as Water Equities, while DH2O.L is Global Equities. AQWA.L tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index, while DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AQWA.L and 0.65% for DH2O.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQWA.L and DH2O.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer