PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AQEAX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Disciplined Core Fund (AQEAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AQEAX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 8.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AQEAX having a 14.87% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 15.59%.


AQEAX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
4.05%
6M
2.75%
1Y
18.07%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
14.87%

SWPPX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
8.10%
6M
6.82%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AQEAX
Columbia Disciplined Core Fund
4.05%14.25%25.67%24.11%-19.03%32.22%13.79%36.92%-3.97%22.22%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
8.10%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AQEAX and SWPPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2003

0.97

The correlation between AQEAX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AQEAX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AQEAX
AQEAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AQEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AQEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Disciplined Core Fund (AQEAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AQEAXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.51

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

11.20

-3.00

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AQEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AQEAX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AQEAX drawdown since its inception was -57.90%, which is greater than SWPPX's maximum drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQEAX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AQEAXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.90%

-55.06%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.89%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-18.74%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

-24.51%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-33.80%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-3.22%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-9.93%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.99%

+0.22%

Volatility

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Disciplined Core Fund (AQEAX) is 4.60%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that AQEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AQEAXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.92%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.93%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

12.57%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

17.04%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

18.24%

+1.74%

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AQEAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

AQEAX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

AQEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%, more than SWPPX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQEAX
Columbia Disciplined Core Fund
10.90%11.34%11.89%3.91%7.58%17.49%4.96%19.02%8.62%4.62%1.28%1.28%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AQEAX and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWPPX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to AQEAX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQEAX dropped -57.90% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AQEAX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer